Epperson

Epperson v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20221:22-cv-00855California2,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS EPPERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00855-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: UNITED STATES, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT

17 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Chris Epperson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on July 11, 2022. (Doc. 1). Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating that he wants to stand on this complaint and have it reviewed by the presiding district judge, in which case the Court will issue findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.