Acebedo

(PC) Castaneda v. Acebedo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20221:16-cv-01562California16,505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS BONILLA CASTANEDA, Case No.: 1:16-cv-01562-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 75)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16 17 Defendants Acebedo, Collins, Pfeiffer, Peterson and Williams move for summary judgment addressing the merits of Plaintiff’s operative complaint. (Doc. 75.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied.1 I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his first amended complaint on July 10, 2017. (Doc. 13.) Following issuance of the Third Screening Order on March 26, 2018, (Doc. 16), the Court ordered service appropriate on claim two of the first amended complaint—deliberate indifference to a serious risk of harm

1 In arriving at these findings and recommendations, the court carefully reviewed and considered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.