Moore

(PC) McCullom v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20222:21-cv-00633California1,448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN LEE McCULLOM, Case No. 2:21-cv-00633-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS STEVEN MOORE, et al., ECF No. 6 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT

PLAINTIFF:

16 (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A RECOMMENDATION

THAT IT BE DISMISSED, OR

18 (2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 19 ECF No. 5

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, raises numerous, unrelated violations of his constitutional rights against several defendants and, thus, his complaint cannot proceed. I will give plaintiff one more chance to amend his complaint before recommending that it be dismissed. I will also grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. 27 28 Screening and Pleading Requirements …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.