Carter

(PC) Israel v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20222:21-cv-01267California1,337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AKIVA A. ISRAEL, No. 2:21-cv-01267-DAD-KJN (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

RUBY CARTER, et al., (Doc. No. 60) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Akiva A. Israel is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the previously- assigned district judge’s July 26, 2022 order dismissing several of plaintiff’s claims (Doc. No. 57). (Doc. No. 60.) On March 24, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the action proceed only on plaintiff’s claims one and two in which plaintiff had alleged that defendant Ruby Carter violated her rights under the Eighth Amendment by denying plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.