Maez
Maez v. Maez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LILLIAN MARIE MAEZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00901-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TOMMY J. MAEZ, II, et al., REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION Defendants. (Doc. 7) 16 Plaintiff Lillian Marie Maez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil action against Tommy J. Maez, II, Judge Ryan I. Wells, and Deseree M. Coronado on July 20, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On July 29, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and granted her leave to amend. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed on September 6, 2022, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 7.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or…