Borbolla

(PC) Hernandez v. Borbolla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20221:19-cv-01698California5,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN HERNANDEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01698-BAK (HBK) (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

v.

OLIVIA BORBOLLA, (Doc. No. 23)

Defendant. Clerk of Court to close the case. 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Olivia Borbolla’s (“Defendant” or “Borbolla”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 23, “MSJ”). The MSJ contained a Rand 2 warning and notice under Local Rule 260(b). (Doc. No. 23-3). On January 13, 2022, the Court again advised Plaintiff of Local Rule 260(b) and directed a response to the MSJ within twenty-one days. (Doc. No. 27). Plaintiff elected not to file a response in opposition to the MSJ. Having considered the record and finding no genuine dispute of material fact that Defendant did not act or fail to act with deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights, the Court grants Defendant’s MSJ. 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.