Martinelli

Martinelli v. Johnson & Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20222:15-cv-01733California6,993 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOANN MARTINELLI, individually and No. 2:15-cv-01733-MCE-DB on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. 14 JOHNSON & JOHNSON and McNEIL NUTRITIONALS, LLC, Defendants. 17 Through this class action, Plaintiff JoAnn Martinelli (“Plaintiff”), individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, seeks relief from Defendants Johnson & Johnson and McNeil Nutritionals, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) arising from the labeling and sale of Benecol Regular and Light Spreads (“Benecol Spreads”). On September 28, 2021, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement agreement reached by the parties. ECF No. 270. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. ECF Nos. 273 (“Mot. Final Approval”), 277. Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursements of Costs and Expenses, and an Incentive Award. ECF Nos. 271…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.