Neuschmid

(PC) Swafford v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20222:19-cv-00721California597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE SWAFFORD, No. 2:19-cv-0721 DAD AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

R. NEUSHMID, et al., DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 46, 65) 16 17 Plaintiff Lee Swafford is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 46) be granted. (Doc. No. 65.) The findings and recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Id. at 14.) Plaintiff filed timely objections to the pending findings and recommendations. (Doc. No. 66.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.