Kinross

(PC) Elias v. Kinross

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20222:17-cv-02106California1,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEIRON M. ELIAS, No. 2:17-cv-2106 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. KINROSS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff,1 a state prisoner, proceeds through appointed limited-purpose counsel with claims under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”). Following the court’s order of April 2, 2019 (ECF No. 23), this case proceeded only on (1) a First Amendment free exercise claim against Correctional Officer Kinross, Lieutenant Gilliam, and Lieutenant Appleberry, and (2) a claim under RLUIPA against Warden Fox for prospective injunctive relief. For the following reasons, the court will substitute Jennifer Benavidez, Chief Deputy Warden at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”), for Warden Fox under Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to the RLUIPA claim presently against Warden Fox for prospective injunctive relief. 27 1 Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.