Munoz
(PC) Harris v. Munoz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRADY HARRIS, No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JEFF MACOMBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force, failed to protect him, and retaliated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. Presently before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of defendants1 Calderon, Rose, Munoz, Fong, Williamson, Fuller, Cervantes, and Thompson. (ECF No. 118.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that the motion be granted in part and denied in part. //// //// 26 1 Defendants Calderon, Rose, Munoz, Fong, Williamson, Fuller, Cervantes, and Thompson are represented by the Office of the Attorney General. Defendant Leavitt is separately represented and filed a separate…