(HC)Cardenas
(HC)Cardenas v. Solano County Superior Court Judge
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JULIAN MARTIN CARDENAS, No. 2:22-cv-0922 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
JUDGE,
14 Respondent.
16 17 Petitioner, a pretrial detainee at Solano County Jail proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee for this application or submit an in forma pauperis application. On June 7, 2022, the court ordered petitioner to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the filing fee for this action. (ECF No. 5 at 1.) Petitioner was given thirty days leave to do so. (Id.) Petitioner was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) More than thirty days have passed and petitioner has not paid the filing fee in this action, submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, requested an extension of time, or 27…