Rao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL JOHN BRADWAY, No. 2:20-cv-0436 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER YAHODARA RAO, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On July 26, 2022, defendant was granted summary judgment. On August 5, 2022, defendant submitted a bill of costs for $413.00 associated with deposition expenses. (ECF No. 91.) Plaintiff filed a document styled “Dispute to Bill of Costs,” which this court construes as objections. (ECF No. 93.) As set forth below, the court overrules plaintiff’s objections and grants the bill of costs.1 Background Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, alleged that defendant Dr. Rao violated plaintiff’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and breached an implied contract by authorizing Dr. Solis to allow plaintiff’s single cell status to expire and by failing to intervene to preserve his single cell status. 26 Orders concerning the award of costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 are…