Garcia

(PC) Camposeco v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20221:21-cv-01190California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL CAMPOSECO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01190-AWI-BAK (SKO) (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

v. COURT TO CLOSE CASE ANDY GARCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Samuel Camposeco is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The complaint has not been screened or served. No defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, nor has any attorney appeared on behalf of a defendant. Plaintiff has filed a pleading captioned as “Motion to Dismiss Suit Based on Stipulations by Both Parties.” (ECF No. 8.) The Court construes this pleading as a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Under this rule, “. . . the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.