Vera

(PC) Williams v. Vera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20221:22-cv-00096California623 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, No. 1:22-cv-00096-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. No. 9) N. VERA, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

16 (Doc. No. 11)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

18 Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in this action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 26, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff not be allowed proceed in forma pauperis and that Plaintiff be directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed with this action. (Doc. No. 9 at 6.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Id.) On January 31, 2022, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.