Castillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., Case No. 1:20-cv-01199-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO MODIFY THE DISCOVERY

AND SCHEDULING ORDER

S. CASTILLO, et al., (Doc. 58) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Curtis Lee Henderson, Sr., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 8, 2022, Defendants S. Castillo and N. Tyler filed a Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 58.) Although the time for Plaintiff’s response has not yet passed, see Local Rule 230(l), the Court deems one unnecessary because it finds good cause to grant Defendants’ motion. DISCUSSION & ORDER “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation & internal quotation marks omitted). District courts also have “wide discretion…