Samuel

(HC) Allen v. Samuel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20221:21-cv-01088California552 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE RAY ALLEN, No. 1:21-cv-01088-ADA-EPG-HC Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

D. SAMUEL, TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Respondent. (Doc. No. 14) 16 17 Petitioner Clarence Ray Allen is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 3, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be denied. (Doc. No. 14.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days after service. Petitioner filed timely objections. (Doc. No. 17.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.