Fox

(PC) Birrell v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20222:16-cv-01818California275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID WESLEY BIRRELL, et al., No. 2:16-cv-1818 KJM CKD P Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT W. FOX, Defendant. 16 On August 4, 2022, the court ordered that plaintiff David Wesley Birrell file a response to the court’s June 29, 2022 order by September 2, 2022. Plaintiff Birrell was warned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that plaintiff Birrell be dismissed. Plaintiff Birrell has not complied with the court’s August 4, 2022 order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff Birrell be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff Birrell may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.