Quintanar, Jr. v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20221:18-cv-01403California9,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDUARDO QUINTANAR, JR., No. 1:18-cv-01403-TLN-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on two Motions to Dismiss: (1) Defendants County of Stanislaus (“County”), Birgit Fladager, Marlissa Ferreira, David Harris, Kirk Bunch, Steve Jacobson, and Cory Brown’s (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 68); and (2) Defendants City of Modesto (“Modesto”) and Jon Evers’s (collectively, “City Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 69). Plaintiff Eduardo Quintanar, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) opposed each motion. (ECF Nos. 74, 75.) Defendants filed replies. (ECF Nos. 77, 78.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motions. /// ///

When the Court discusses County Defendants and City Defendants together, it will refer to them collectively as “Defendants.” 28 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.