Jimenez

Jimenez v. Ayres Hotel Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20222:22-cv-00867California2,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOR JIMENEZ, No. 2:22-cv-00867-DAD-KJN Plaintiff, v. SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER AYERS HOTEL COMPANY, INC., Defendant. 16 On May 23, 2022, the then-assigned district judge issued an “initial pretrial scheduling order” in this case, which provided that: In any cases involving E.R.I.S.A, Class−Actions, or Administrative Appeals, the parties shall file a short joint statement with the Court identifying the type of case within thirty (30) days of service on all defendant(s). Based upon the provided information, the Court may issue a supplemental pretrial scheduling order. (Doc. No. 3 at 6.) On September 1, 2022, the parties filed a joint Rule 26(f) report, in which the parties identify this case as a class action and provided the court with their preferences for case management and scheduling. (Doc. No. 9.) Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.