Ciolli

(HC) Harrington v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20221:21-cv-00658California852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PERRY HARRINGTON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00658-AWI-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING

v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS,

TERMINATING PETITIONER’S MOTION

CIOLLI, FOR SUPPLEMENT, DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

Respondent. CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

17 (ECF Nos. 18, 21, 22) 18 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 28, 2022,1 the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as Petitioner failed to satisfy the criteria to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.