ASA Enterprise, Inc. v. Stan Boyett & Son, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20221:21-cv-00915California11,487 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ASA ENTERPRISE, INC., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00915-BAK
Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: INFORMAL DISCOVERY
DISPUTE RULING IN FAVOR OF
v. DEFENDANT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY
STAN BOYETT & SON, INC., (ECF Nos. 31, 34, 35, 36) Defendant. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is a discovery dispute that the parties have agreed to submit to the Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background On June 9, 2021, Plaintiffs ASA Enterprise, Inc. (“ASA”), and Manjit Singh (“Singh”), filed this action against Defendant Stan Boyett & Son, Inc. (“Boyett”). (ECF No. 1.) The action was initially assigned to then Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. On September 9, 2021, a scheduling order issued, setting among other deadlines, a nonexpert discovery deadline of May 31, 2022. (ECF No. 18.) The scheduling order specified…