ASA Enterprise, Inc. v. Stan Boyett & Son, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20221:21-cv-00915California11,487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ASA ENTERPRISE, INC., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00915-BAK

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: INFORMAL DISCOVERY

DISPUTE RULING IN FAVOR OF

v. DEFENDANT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY

STAN BOYETT & SON, INC., (ECF Nos. 31, 34, 35, 36) Defendant. 16 17 18 Currently before the Court is a discovery dispute that the parties have agreed to submit to the Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background On June 9, 2021, Plaintiffs ASA Enterprise, Inc. (“ASA”), and Manjit Singh (“Singh”), filed this action against Defendant Stan Boyett & Son, Inc. (“Boyett”). (ECF No. 1.) The action was initially assigned to then Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. On September 9, 2021, a scheduling order issued, setting among other deadlines, a nonexpert discovery deadline of May 31, 2022. (ECF No. 18.) The scheduling order specified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.