(PC)Roberson

(PC)Roberson v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20221:22-cv-00833California530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MORRIS ROBERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00833-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION

CDCR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 9)

16 Plaintiff Morris Roberson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 22, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found a cognizable excessive force claim against Chavez, Salazer, Kyt, Lirio and Furlong, and a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants Valero, Rodriguez, Charles, Furlong, Acebedo, Lirio, Hunter, Loza and Gonzalez. (ECF No. 8.) However, Plaintiff fails to state any other cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff was informed that he could file an amended complaint or a notice of intent to proceed on the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.