(PC)Roberson
(PC)Roberson v. CDCR
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20221:22-cv-00833California530 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MORRIS ROBERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00833-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION
CDCR, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF
Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 9)
16 Plaintiff Morris Roberson is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 22, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found a cognizable excessive force claim against Chavez, Salazer, Kyt, Lirio and Furlong, and a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants Valero, Rodriguez, Charles, Furlong, Acebedo, Lirio, Hunter, Loza and Gonzalez. (ECF No. 8.) However, Plaintiff fails to state any other cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff was informed that he could file an amended complaint or a notice of intent to proceed on the claims…