Doe
Doe v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA DOE, a fictitious name; CLARA No. 2:21-cv-01438-MCE-CKD DOE, a fictitious name, and “I.D.,” a fictitious name, by and through her next friend, MARIA DOE, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
OFFICE; DARRYL RODERICK;
JAGDEEP SINGH, individually and as administrator of the Estate of Sushma Giri; V & N ASSOCIATES, LLC; and
ALIDA ESTRADA,
19 Defendants.
21 Through the present lawsuit, Plaintiffs allege they were unlawfully evicted during the COVID-19 pandemic from an apartment in Sacramento managed by Defendant Alida Estrada and owned by Defendant Jagdeep Singh. Plaintiffs, a single mother and her two children, allege that Defendant Darryl Roderick, a Sacramento County Sheriff’s Deputy, wrongfully assisted Defendant Estrada in effectuating their eviction. Plaintiffs’ currently operative pleading, the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), contains sixteen different causes of action asserting, in addition…