Perez

(PC) Sekona v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20221:19-cv-00400California746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-JLT-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY DEFENDANTS MALDONADO AND R.

v. PEREZ SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FROM THIS CASE FOR PLAINTIFF’S

R. PEREZ, et al., FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE (ECF No. 59.)

Defendants.

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

21 I. BACKGROUND Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 13, 2021, against defendants Correctional Officer (C/O) R. Perez, C/O L. Munoz, C/O C. Sims, and C/O Maldonado for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 39.) On February 17, 2022, the court issued an order directing service upon Defendants in this case. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.