Perez
(PC) Sekona v. Perez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ETUATE SEKONA, 1:19-cv-00400-JLT-GSA-PC Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY DEFENDANTS MALDONADO AND R.
v. PEREZ SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FROM THIS CASE FOR PLAINTIFF’S
R. PEREZ, et al., FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE (ECF No. 59.)
Defendants.
THIRTY DAY DEADLINE
21 I. BACKGROUND Etuate Sekona (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 28, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on December 13, 2021, against defendants Correctional Officer (C/O) R. Perez, C/O L. Munoz, C/O C. Sims, and C/O Maldonado for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 39.) On February 17, 2022, the court issued an order directing service upon Defendants in this case. …