(PC) Martin v. De La Cruz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED ANDREW MARTIN, No. 1:22-cv-00812-ADA-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO DISQUALIFY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

v. (Doc. No. 12) DE LA CRUZ, et al.,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

Defendant. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION

16 (Doc. No. 11)

18 On July 1, 2022, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Stanley Boone pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On July 7, 2022, the magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 6.) After screening the initial complaint, the magistrate judge determined that plaintiff had failed to state a cognizable claim and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. No. 7.) In the order granting leave to amend, the magistrate judge addressed seven potential causes of action that plaintiff appeared to raise in his complaint. (Id.) …