(HC)Ram

(HC)Ram v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20221:21-cv-01520California1,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTOSH RAM, Case No. 1:21-cv-01520-JLT-EPG-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND

v. MOTION FOR DEPOSITION

WARDEN, (ECF Nos. 15, 17)

Respondent.

16 Petitioner Santosh Ram is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding. The undersigned previously issued findings and recommendation recommending that Respondent’s motion to dismiss (based on exhaustion grounds) be denied and the petition be denied on the merits. (ECF No. 12.) The Court received Petitioner’s objections to the findings and recommendation, which indicated that Petitioner never received a copy of Respondent’s response to the petition. (ECF No. 13 at 1.)1 Therefore, the Court vacated the findings and recommendation and ordered Petitioner to file a response to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.