Rios

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MCKINLEY PIERCE ATKINS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00193-ADA-BAK (GSA) (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO EXHAUST

E. RIOS, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff McKinley Pierce Atkins is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

20 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing his complaint on February 6, 2020. (Doc. 1.) 21 In a screening order issued June 8, 2020, the Court found Plaintiff had failed to state a 22 claim upon which relief could be granted. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff was granted 21 days within which to 23 amend his complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the screening order. (Id. at 7.) 24 On September 8, 2020, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause (OSC) why the action 25 should not be dismissed…