Harper
Harper v. Charter Communications, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 LIONEL HARPER, DANIEL SINCLAIR, No. 2:19-cv-00902 WBS DMC HASSAN TURNER, LUIS VAZQUEZ, and PEDRO ABASCAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and all ORDER STAYING CASE aggrieved employees, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v.
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
18 Defendant.
20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Defendant Charter has appealed this court’s denial of 22 its motion to compel arbitration of plaintiff Harper’s PAGA claim 23 and dismiss remaining count ten claims. (Docket Nos. 300, 306.) 24 A federal court can stay a proceeding pending the outcome of an 25 appeal. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 421 (2009). The power 26 to stay proceedings “is incidental to the power inherent in every 27 court to control the disposition of the cases on its docket with 28 nee nnn en nn ne non nn nnn nnn EO OO IE IN
economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936). Notwithstanding any…