Trate

(PC) Milton v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20221:22-cv-00988California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 KYLE DAVID MILTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00988-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 B.M. TRATE, et al., (ECF No. 7)

Defendants.

17 Kyle David Milton (“Plaintiff’) is incarcerated at Atwater U.S. Penitentiary and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On September 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he cannot afford counsel; because the issues involved in this case are complex; because he cannot adequately represent himself in this action; because he has limited access to legal materials; because he has no ability to investigate the facts of this case; because he has written letters to non-profit legal aid agencies, to no avail; because he has an extremely limited knowledge of the law; and because this is a meritorious case. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.