Hurtado

(PC) Adkins v. Hurtado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20222:21-cv-00531California871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00531-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER: v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO CHANGE PLEADINGS AND

DAVID HURTADO, et al., DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A

RESPONSIVE PLEADING WITHIN

Defendants. THIRTY DAYS OF THIS ORDER; AND (2) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT

TO SEPARATELY DOCKET THE

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CONTAINED THEREIN

17 ECF No. 36

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

SCREENING ORDER FINDING THAT

PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT STATES COGNIZABLE

FIRST AMENDMENT ACCESS TO

COURT AND EQUAL PROTECTION

CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

HURTADO AND MARSHAK AND A

FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION

CLAIM AGAINST MARSHAK

25 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, has moved to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.