(SS) King v. Commissioner Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20222:20-cv-02178California3,932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DENISE LEA KING, No. 2:20-cv-2178 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the Court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 Plaintiff’s motion argues that the Administrative Law Judge’s decision is constitutionally defective, and that the Administrative Law Judge’s treatment of the medical opinion evidence, plaintiff’s testimony, residual functional capacity determination, and step five finding were erroneous.

25 1 After the filing of this action Kilolo Kijakazi was appointed Acting Commissioner of Social Security and has, therefore, been substituted as the defendant. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.