Brown

Brown v. Zymey Industries

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20221:22-cv-00712California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JAMES BROWN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00712-AWI-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

v. A RC ECTI OO MN M S EH NO DU EL DD FN OO RT DB IE S MISSAL 12 (Doc. 5) ZYMEY INDUSTRIES, et al.,

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

15 _____________________________________/ 16 17 Plaintiff Jeremy James Brown is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 14, 2022. (Doc. 1). On August 2, 2022, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. 5.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested an extension of time in which to do so. The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.