(PC) Tran v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20221:19-cv-00148California636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BINH CUONG TRAN, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00148-ADA-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

S. SMITH, et al., ) JUDGMENT ) ) (Doc. Nos. 85, 91) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff Binh Cuoung Tran (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 28, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies (Doc. No. 85) be denied. (Doc. No. 91.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.