(SS) Flemming v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 20221:21-cv-00267California7,227 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROSE MARIE FLEMMING, Case No. 1:21-cv-00267-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

v. S ECURITY COMPLAINT 12 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, (Doc. 1) Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. _____________________________________/

16 I. INTRODUCTION On February 25, 2021, Plaintiff Rose Marie Flemming (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate Judge.1 25 26

1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (Docs. 7, 9.) 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.