Great American Ins. Co. v. Paul Blanco's Good Car Co. Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20222:21-cv-00057California2,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE No. 2:21-cv-00057-TLN-DB

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

PAUL BLANCO’S GOOD CAR

COMPANY SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 9.) Defendants Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Sacramento, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Bakersfield, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Stockton, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Fresno, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Oakland, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Inland Empire, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company East LA, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Reno, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Fairfield, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Las Vegas, Paul Blanco, and Putu Blanco (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. /// /// I. FACTUAL AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.