Totton

Totton v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20222:20-cv-01152California4,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGEL TOTTON, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01152-TLN-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Sacramento (“City”), Officer Sarabjit Virk (“Officer Virk”), and Officer Linda Matthew’s (“Officer Matthew”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiffs Angel Totton, Paris Flores, and Jania Johnson1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion. /// /// ///

Totton, Flores, and Johnson bring this action individually and as guardians of minor children, K.T., G.F., and R.J. (ECF No. 18 at 1.) The Court will refer to K.T., G.F., and R.J. collectively as “minor Plaintiffs” herein. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND At approximately 10:30 a.m. on June 21, 2019, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.