Totton
Totton v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGEL TOTTON, et al., No. 2:20-cv-01152-TLN-KJN Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants City of Sacramento (“City”), Officer Sarabjit Virk (“Officer Virk”), and Officer Linda Matthew’s (“Officer Matthew”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiffs Angel Totton, Paris Flores, and Jania Johnson1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 36.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 37.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion. /// /// ///
Totton, Flores, and Johnson bring this action individually and as guardians of minor children, K.T., G.F., and R.J. (ECF No. 18 at 1.) The Court will refer to K.T., G.F., and R.J. collectively as “minor Plaintiffs” herein. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND At approximately 10:30 a.m. on June 21, 2019, the…