A.A.M.

A.A.M. v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20222:21-cv-01619California1,203 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

LAW OFFICE OF DALE K. GALIPO

DALE K. GALIPO, SBN 144074

Hang D. Le, Esq., SBN 293450 21800 Burbank Blvd., Suite 310 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: (818) 347-3333 4 Facsimile: (818) 347-4118

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ

STEWART KATZ, State Bar #127425 555 University Avenue, Suite 270 7 Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: (916) 444-5678

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 A.A.M., individually and as successor in interest Case No. 2:21-cv-1619-MCE-JDP 14 to AUGUSTINE MORALES, Deceased, by and (related to Case No. 2:21-cv-2093) through WENDY GRIJALVA, as Guardian ad Litem; A.B.M., individually and as successor in interest to AUGUSTINE MORALES, Deceased, STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE by and through WENDY GRIJALVA, as CASES; ORDER 17 Guardian ad Litem ; JOSEPH MORALES, WENDY GRIJALVA,

19 Plaintiffs, vs.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; JEREMIAH JARVIS

22 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 24 The parties, all Plaintiffs and Defendants in the related cases of A.A.M. 25 individually and as successor in interest to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.