Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20221:20-cv-01047California1,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANA GRAY, No. 1:20-CV-01047-ADA-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO WITHDRAW CONSENT TO

A. KHOO, et al., MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION Defendant. (Doc. No. 117) 16 17 Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a complaint on July 29, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.) The following day, the court served new case documents on the Central California Women’s Facility, where Plaintiff is housed. (Dock No. 5-4.) One of those documents was a “Consent/Decline of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction” form accompanied by an explanation of what consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction entails. (Doc. No. 4-1.) Neither party informed the court whether it would consent or decline to magistrate judge jurisdiction until Plaintiff filed two Notices to the Court of Plaintiff’s Consent to Magistrate Judge for Jury…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.