(SS) Frost v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20221:20-cv-00410California1,640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL FROST, Case No. 1:20-cv-00410-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY

v. FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 21)

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Jonathan O. Peña (“Counsel”), attorney for Michael Frost (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant motion for attorney fees on July 20, 2022. (Mot. Att’y Fees (“Mot.”), ECF No. 21.) Counsel requests fees in the gross amount of $32,590.28 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), with an offset of $5,589.28 for fees previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”). Plaintiff was served with the motion and advised that any opposition to the motion was to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 21 at 1, 9.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the request. On July 20, 2022, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”), filed a statement of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.