(PC) Gray v. Clark
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR ATTENDANCE OF TRIAL v. WITNESSES 12 KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF Nos. 68, 69) 13 Defendants.
15 Plaintiff Thomas Eugene Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motions for attendance of trial witnesses, filed September 1, 2022, respectively. (ECF Nos. 68, 69.) Defendants filed an opposition on September 21, 2022. (ECF No. 78.) Although the deadline to file a reply has not expired, the Court deems a reply unnecessary. I. DISCUSSION The uncertainty regarding whether or not the proposed witnesses are willing to testify voluntarily does not preclude this Court from ordering their transportation. Rather, in determining whether to grant…