(PC) Roberts v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 DAVID NATHANIEL ROBERTS, No. 2:20-cv-01349 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 17 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 21, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued an order finding that plaintiff’s complaint stated a potentially cognizable First Amendment claim against defendants Peluso and Jones but did not state any other cognizable claims in the complaint, including against the “Accounting Staff” and “Mail Delivery Staff”. (Docket No. 19.) The order directed plaintiff to notify the court of how he wished to proceed, and it included a form titled “Plaintiff’s Notice on How to Proceed” with two 3 …