(HC) Sho v. S.F. Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONSURU WOLE SHO, No. 1:21-cv-01812-TLN-AC Petitioner, v. ORDER CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD

OFFICER DIRECTOR, SAN

FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE, UNITED

STATES IMMIGRATION AND

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., Respondents. 18 Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 16, 2022, a magistrate judge previously assigned to this action issued findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 22.) Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 28 …