(PC) Freeman v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20221:21-cv-00611California5,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 LEROY FREEMAN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00611-JLT-BAK (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANTS

v. CLARK AND BELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS

BE GRANTED

KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF No. 20) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS 16 I. INTRODUCTION Leroy Freeman (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding through counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 12, 2021. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff was incarcerated at California State Prison, Corcoran (“Corcoran”), when he was diagnosed with a condition that required surgical intervention. Plaintiff asserted that following the surgery, he did not receive proper care at Corcoran, which resulted in permanent paralysis. Plaintiff sought to hold Ken Clark, the Warden at Corcoran; Celia Bell, the CEO of Health Care at Corcoran; and unidentified medical providers liable for 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.