(SS) Sok v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20222:21-cv-00990California3,403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROTHY SOK, No. 2:21-cv-00990 CKD SS Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction to conduct all proceedings in the case, including the entry of final judgment. For the reasons discussed below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and deny the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1979, applied on October 23, 2018 for DIB, alleging disability beginning January 18, 2018. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 15, 25. Plaintiff alleged she was unable to work due to back injury, anxiety, depression, panic, muscle pain, body tension, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.