Mohyuddin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SHEPARD, Case No. 2:20-cv-01445-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

ALIASGHAR MOHYUDDIN, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On August 19, 2022, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 34. To 18 date, plaintiff has not filed a response to defendants’ motion. 19 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party 20 is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the 21 date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a 22 statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the 23 motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id. 24 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet…