Doss

Doss v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20221:20-cv-00907California2,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JUSTIN DOSS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00907-BAK (SKO)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. DISCOVERY MOTIONS

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT

INSURANCE COMPANY, (Docs. 26, 27) Defendant. _____________________________________/ 16 I. INTRODUCTION On June 1, 2022, the deadline for non-expert discovery, Plaintiff Justin Doss (“Plaintiff”) filed motions seeking to: (1) extend or, in the alternative, reopen, discovery; and (2) take 21 additional depositions (the “Motions”). (Docs. 26, 27.) The parties filed their “Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement” directed to the Motions, as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on June 22, 2022 (the “Joint Statement”). (Doc. 28.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for July 6, 2022, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 30.) Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.