Robles

Robles v. Riano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20222:22-cv-00085California3,140 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

|iPoRTER SCOTT |] APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION William E. Camy, SBN 291397 3 || Megan N. Boelter, SBN 340235 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

6 || Wcamy@porterscott.com mboelter@porterscott.com Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF ROSEVILLE, OFFICER DEAN RIANO, OFFICER SETH ADDINGTON an g SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER CIAMPA Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code section 6103 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 12 || KATHERINE ROBLES, an individual; and H.R., No. 2:22-cev-0085 KJM DB by and through his guardian ad litem Katherine 14 || Robles; STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, 16 || Vs. ||CITY OF ROSEVILLE, a Municipal Corporation; OFFICER DEAN RIANO, in his 18 || official and personal capacity; OFFICER SETH ADDINGTON, in his official and qpeisonal 19 || capacity; SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER CIAMPA, in his official and personal capacity, DOES 1-20, inclusive, individually, jointly and severally, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.