Rios

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:18-cv-3089 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and protective order1 and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that both motions be denied. I. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION A. Relevant Factual Allegations In support of the motion for a preliminary injunction, plaintiff asserts that defendants Rios and White “have targeted [him] for retaliation by using other officers to tamper[] with [his] mail 27 Although plaintiff requests a protective order, this matter…