Solorio

(PC) Ponce v. Solorio

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20221:22-cv-01012California525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRY GABRIEL PONCE, JR., Case No. 1:22-cv-01012-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

M. SOLORIO, et al., (ECF No. 12) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Terry Gabriel Ponce, Jr., is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed September 23, 2022. There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require any attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.