Ison
Ison v. Schulman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20222:21-cv-01546California6,159 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES J. ISON and THE ISON LAW No. 2:21-cv-01546-MCE-KJN
FIRM, PC,
12 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
ETHAN P. SCHULMAN, THE
JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA,
TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE,
MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
MERCURY CASUALTY COMPANY,
CALIFORNIA AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY, RANDALL
R. PETRO, TARA L. STRONG, KERN
SEGAL & MURRAY, PHILIP A.
SEGAL, BRYANA S. McGUIRK, TODD
P. DRAKEFORD, MICHAEL S.
THOMAS, GRACE M. HARRIET,
STUART D. DIAMOND, STUART
DIAMOND LAW & MEDIATION
OFFICE, STACEY DIAMOND-GARCIA
and DOES 1 TO 25, Defendants. 25 Through the present case, Plaintiffs James J. Ison and his firm, The Ison Law Firm PC (“Plaintiffs”) seek relief from allegedly erroneous rulings issued by Defendant Ethan P. Schulman, a state court judge with Defendant Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, in litigation stemming from the mediation of a personal…